<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternatives to paid-online-news cliff jumping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/</link>
	<description>Journalist, consultant, entrepreneur ... Musings on digital media, Web 2.0/3.0, &#38; news in the Internet era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Presentation: Business models for online news &#124; Zombie Journalism</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-122473</link>
		<dc:creator>Presentation: Business models for online news &#124; Zombie Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-122473</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Outing&#8217;s thoughts on micropayments  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Outing&#8217;s thoughts on micropayments  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Una piattaforma unica per il sostegno finanziario dell’ informazione online &#124; LSDI</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-46097</link>
		<dc:creator>Una piattaforma unica per il sostegno finanziario dell’ informazione online &#124; LSDI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-46097</guid>
		<description>[...] In Francia sarebbe il primo esperimento del genere, mentre altrove ne sono stati già fatti alcuni: negli Stati Uniti ad esempio, con Kachingle e qualche altro. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Francia sarebbe il primo esperimento del genere, mentre altrove ne sono stati già fatti alcuni: negli Stati Uniti ad esempio, con Kachingle e qualche altro. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspapers need to reinvent &#124; Save the Media</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-28451</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspapers need to reinvent &#124; Save the Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-28451</guid>
		<description>[...] a metaphor or simile about the state of the news business. The news business has been compared to lemmings, railroads and, of course, the horse and buggy.  (Read Nick Bergus&#8217; post on the topic for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a metaphor or simile about the state of the news business. The news business has been compared to lemmings, railroads and, of course, the horse and buggy.  (Read Nick Bergus&#8217; post on the topic for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Golebiewski</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-26751</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Golebiewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-26751</guid>
		<description>Thank you Steve.

I have to add that with Znak it! the registration barrier you mention is easy to jump over, as it is raised only once. Then, if the users do not want to login and log out each time, the system can run all their content request and payment transactions for them, just like in Skype, for example. More, the Znaks can be redeemed at any participating site with any type and form of content (in a few weeks we will open an online music service available for Znaks!) and therefore the system reduces the need to register and helps maintain users privacy. In the long run, Znak it! results in less registration and easier access -- two clicks with your mouse and all can be done for the users and the content provider, of course, by the platform itself. 

As for your second point, Znak it! can be customized in such a way that the content providers have a full price control and full transparency of the traffic/content usage; they can change the price to stimulate usage in real time, based on the stats and users&#039; ratings available from the control panel; they can also let the users to set up their own prices (auction-style), or they can let the content to be downloaded for free -- whatever the overall strategy or needs are. 

I must also add that the users have the opportunity to earn Znaks buy clicking on interactive ads and surveys. In other words, some content can be still sponsored by advertisers and therefore &quot;free&quot; to the Web users the way it is &quot;free&quot; now, the Google or Yahoo style. The important difference is that up to 97% of the credits from the advertising agencies go directly to the content providers. 

This is why I dare to claim the system is better, more flexible, safer and nearly intuitive to use -- a real win-win situation. It can be used by large content providers as well as individual bloggers. It can be used by the Web users in social networks to trade or exchange virtual and even real goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Steve.</p>
<p>I have to add that with Znak it! the registration barrier you mention is easy to jump over, as it is raised only once. Then, if the users do not want to login and log out each time, the system can run all their content request and payment transactions for them, just like in Skype, for example. More, the Znaks can be redeemed at any participating site with any type and form of content (in a few weeks we will open an online music service available for Znaks!) and therefore the system reduces the need to register and helps maintain users privacy. In the long run, Znak it! results in less registration and easier access &#8212; two clicks with your mouse and all can be done for the users and the content provider, of course, by the platform itself. </p>
<p>As for your second point, Znak it! can be customized in such a way that the content providers have a full price control and full transparency of the traffic/content usage; they can change the price to stimulate usage in real time, based on the stats and users&#8217; ratings available from the control panel; they can also let the users to set up their own prices (auction-style), or they can let the content to be downloaded for free &#8212; whatever the overall strategy or needs are. </p>
<p>I must also add that the users have the opportunity to earn Znaks buy clicking on interactive ads and surveys. In other words, some content can be still sponsored by advertisers and therefore &#8220;free&#8221; to the Web users the way it is &#8220;free&#8221; now, the Google or Yahoo style. The important difference is that up to 97% of the credits from the advertising agencies go directly to the content providers. </p>
<p>This is why I dare to claim the system is better, more flexible, safer and nearly intuitive to use &#8212; a real win-win situation. It can be used by large content providers as well as individual bloggers. It can be used by the Web users in social networks to trade or exchange virtual and even real goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Outing</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-26746</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Outing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-26746</guid>
		<description>George: Thanks for pointing out my oversight. Znak-it should be part of my list above.

I can&#039;t say I love your concept for news, though, other than the tiny amount of content that news providers can charge for, because it seems like another barrier for the consumer to jump; and with general news online users aren&#039;t willing to jump (as free registration walls&#039; failure at many newspaper websites proved). 

And there&#039;s still the (unproven) argument of which will work better: 1) traditional model of publisher setting the price and maintaining control, or 2) ceding some control to the user/reader and letting them tell the publisher what something&#039;s worth to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George: Thanks for pointing out my oversight. Znak-it should be part of my list above.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I love your concept for news, though, other than the tiny amount of content that news providers can charge for, because it seems like another barrier for the consumer to jump; and with general news online users aren&#8217;t willing to jump (as free registration walls&#8217; failure at many newspaper websites proved). </p>
<p>And there&#8217;s still the (unproven) argument of which will work better: 1) traditional model of publisher setting the price and maintaining control, or 2) ceding some control to the user/reader and letting them tell the publisher what something&#8217;s worth to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Golebiewski</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-26739</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Golebiewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-26739</guid>
		<description>Steve,

You keep forgetting about Znak it! In my opinion (and I know it very well, because I have developed and run it ;-)), Znak it! is far better than Kachingle or any other content monetization solution proposed or already in use. 

Znak it! was developed back in 2007, when the today&#039;s need (so apparent now) to monetize content in more ways than through advertising was obvious to only a few people. It was conceptualized by a group of MBAs from IESE on a tour to Stanford/Silicon Valley companies and Idealab, and then presented during the 2008 Web 2.0 Expo as the next-generation content monetization solution, ideal for media creators and publishers. 

Earlier this year, Znak it! was invited to participate in the Digital Innovators&#039; Summit in Berlin, where it was reviewed by peers and  media executives, including those from Axel Springer, Hearst, Forbes and many more. Znak it! was also one of the Silver Sponsors and Exhibitors of the 2009 Web 2.0 Expo; it is very well known to Tim O&#039;Really and Clay Shirky (even though the latter does not like it; he does not like any micropayment solution). It is also known to Steven Brill and Alan Mutter, whom I approached months ago and presented the idea. The fact that they have chosen to develop and market their own schemes (without ever acknowledging the source of their inspiration) does not change much. Znak it! is out there; it operates and... it is still the best digital content monetization solution.

I invite you to check it out www.znak-it.com. The system is server-based and works in the “back room,” so, you cannot see it, but we just launched two portals (that are far from perfection); they are mainly to illustrate the idea and its advantages -- but I hope you can judge for yourself Znak&#039;s major benefits: its simplicity, universality, safety, and most of all, an unprecedented return of up to 97% of the content retail price. No other online monetization system can offer so much without any initial fees or heavy integration and maintenance costs. 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You keep forgetting about Znak it! In my opinion (and I know it very well, because I have developed and run it <img src='http://steveouting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), Znak it! is far better than Kachingle or any other content monetization solution proposed or already in use. </p>
<p>Znak it! was developed back in 2007, when the today&#8217;s need (so apparent now) to monetize content in more ways than through advertising was obvious to only a few people. It was conceptualized by a group of MBAs from IESE on a tour to Stanford/Silicon Valley companies and Idealab, and then presented during the 2008 Web 2.0 Expo as the next-generation content monetization solution, ideal for media creators and publishers. </p>
<p>Earlier this year, Znak it! was invited to participate in the Digital Innovators&#8217; Summit in Berlin, where it was reviewed by peers and  media executives, including those from Axel Springer, Hearst, Forbes and many more. Znak it! was also one of the Silver Sponsors and Exhibitors of the 2009 Web 2.0 Expo; it is very well known to Tim O&#8217;Really and Clay Shirky (even though the latter does not like it; he does not like any micropayment solution). It is also known to Steven Brill and Alan Mutter, whom I approached months ago and presented the idea. The fact that they have chosen to develop and market their own schemes (without ever acknowledging the source of their inspiration) does not change much. Znak it! is out there; it operates and&#8230; it is still the best digital content monetization solution.</p>
<p>I invite you to check it out <a href="http://www.znak-it.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.znak-it.com</a>. The system is server-based and works in the “back room,” so, you cannot see it, but we just launched two portals (that are far from perfection); they are mainly to illustrate the idea and its advantages &#8212; but I hope you can judge for yourself Znak&#8217;s major benefits: its simplicity, universality, safety, and most of all, an unprecedented return of up to 97% of the content retail price. No other online monetization system can offer so much without any initial fees or heavy integration and maintenance costs. </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-26277</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-26277</guid>
		<description>Really useful list of micropayment services, Steve - thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really useful list of micropayment services, Steve &#8211; thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ViewPass has potential for data, revenue &#171; Transforming the Gaz</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-26248</link>
		<dc:creator>ViewPass has potential for data, revenue &#171; Transforming the Gaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-26248</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Outing proposed some alternatives to paid content. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Outing proposed some alternatives to paid content. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/03/alternatives-to-paid-online-news-cliff-jumping/comment-page-1/#comment-26115</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=695#comment-26115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working on a site called 1p2U that let&#039;s a blogger&#039;s readers pay them a penny for each item published in their RSS feed. If they don&#039;t publish, the blogger doesn&#039;t get paid and their readers aren&#039;t out of pocket.

This is what is known as an EXCHANGE - of intellectual work for money. It is not a donation. It is not a charge. Like all good bargains both parties enter into such an exchange agreement of their own volition.

No monopoly/copyright/threat of prosecution necessary. The news can spread far and wide.

That&#039;s what I&#039;m about - &lt;em&gt;Making an ethical incentive: money for art, liberty for people.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on a site called 1p2U that let&#8217;s a blogger&#8217;s readers pay them a penny for each item published in their RSS feed. If they don&#8217;t publish, the blogger doesn&#8217;t get paid and their readers aren&#8217;t out of pocket.</p>
<p>This is what is known as an EXCHANGE &#8211; of intellectual work for money. It is not a donation. It is not a charge. Like all good bargains both parties enter into such an exchange agreement of their own volition.</p>
<p>No monopoly/copyright/threat of prosecution necessary. The news can spread far and wide.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m about &#8211; <em>Making an ethical incentive: money for art, liberty for people.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

