<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paying for news content: The continuum spreads wider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveouting.com/2009/06/26/paying-for-news-content-the-continuum-spreads-wider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/26/paying-for-news-content-the-continuum-spreads-wider/</link>
	<description>Journalist, consultant, entrepreneur ... Musings on digital media, Web 2.0/3.0, &#38; news in the Internet era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: making money blogs</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/26/paying-for-news-content-the-continuum-spreads-wider/comment-page-1/#comment-42740</link>
		<dc:creator>making money blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=704#comment-42740</guid>
		<description>Informative post. It will be useful for the readers. But isn&#039;t $5 a month too much, though? Depending on what the subscriber can get from that subscription but is it worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative post. It will be useful for the readers. But isn&#8217;t $5 a month too much, though? Depending on what the subscriber can get from that subscription but is it worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Outing</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/26/paying-for-news-content-the-continuum-spreads-wider/comment-page-1/#comment-28285</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Outing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=704#comment-28285</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Martin. I clarified in the item with a small edit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Martin. I clarified in the item with a small edit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Langeveld</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/06/26/paying-for-news-content-the-continuum-spreads-wider/comment-page-1/#comment-28282</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Langeveld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=704#comment-28282</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, Steve -- one clarification: monthly subscription is completely optional.  Circulate will go to work for you for free.  The hypothetical $5 a  month subscription would get you blanket access to premium content at various participating sites, but it&#039;s not central to the plan, in contrast to Journalism Online&#039;s plan.  Without a mostly-free approach, you&#039;re right that it would be hard to get much traction.  Our analysis says that the big opportunity on this tool is for publishers to improve ad revenue, not subscription revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, Steve &#8212; one clarification: monthly subscription is completely optional.  Circulate will go to work for you for free.  The hypothetical $5 a  month subscription would get you blanket access to premium content at various participating sites, but it&#8217;s not central to the plan, in contrast to Journalism Online&#8217;s plan.  Without a mostly-free approach, you&#8217;re right that it would be hard to get much traction.  Our analysis says that the big opportunity on this tool is for publishers to improve ad revenue, not subscription revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

