<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 links that explain Editor &amp; Publisher&#8217;s demise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveouting.com/2009/12/11/3-links-that-explain-editor-publishers-demise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/12/11/3-links-that-explain-editor-publishers-demise/</link>
	<description>Journalist, consultant, entrepreneur ... Musings on digital media, Web 2.0/3.0, &#38; news in the Internet era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBH / Talking New Media</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/12/11/3-links-that-explain-editor-publishers-demise/comment-page-1/#comment-52090</link>
		<dc:creator>DBH / Talking New Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1085#comment-52090</guid>
		<description>Steve, I agree that E&amp;P was a poor aggregator and lacked industry participation. But . . . 

Ultimately, though, trade magazines are closed because their revenue level does not justify their expenses. I can not for a minute think that some exec at Nielsen concerned themselves with anything other than the P&amp;L statement of the unit.

Magazines need to own their markets, and it is true that from the perspective of a journalist, E&amp;P was no longer the only game in town, or even the most admired and used.  But if E&amp;P had hired Jim Romenesko and his blog were on the E&amp;P site how many more ads would Heidelberg run?  

Last quarter B2B magazine revenue was down almost 28%. No media did worse -- though the closest was (you guessed it) newspapers at -23%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I agree that E&amp;P was a poor aggregator and lacked industry participation. But . . . </p>
<p>Ultimately, though, trade magazines are closed because their revenue level does not justify their expenses. I can not for a minute think that some exec at Nielsen concerned themselves with anything other than the P&amp;L statement of the unit.</p>
<p>Magazines need to own their markets, and it is true that from the perspective of a journalist, E&amp;P was no longer the only game in town, or even the most admired and used.  But if E&amp;P had hired Jim Romenesko and his blog were on the E&amp;P site how many more ads would Heidelberg run?  </p>
<p>Last quarter B2B magazine revenue was down almost 28%. No media did worse &#8212; though the closest was (you guessed it) newspapers at -23%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2009/12/11/3-links-that-explain-editor-publishers-demise/comment-page-1/#comment-51032</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1085#comment-51032</guid>
		<description>E&amp;P put the last nail in the coffin when it became agenda driven with writers sharing time between E&amp;P and Huffington Post. It&#039;s Editor &amp; Publisher, not Editorial &amp; Policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E&amp;P put the last nail in the coffin when it became agenda driven with writers sharing time between E&amp;P and Huffington Post. It&#8217;s Editor &amp; Publisher, not Editorial &amp; Policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

