<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new way to comment: Like it? Don&#8217;t? &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/</link>
	<description>Journalist, consultant, entrepreneur ... Musings on digital media, Web 2.0/3.0, &#38; news in the Internet era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Porter</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66795</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66795</guid>
		<description>Steve, thanks for trying Insight out.

We noticed a bug with Insight when  deployed here that we&#039;ve not seen at other sites.  It is now fixed, so the inline questions and comments should now be available for everyone.

Thanks!  Please do keep the feedback coming.  Making Insight clear, useful, and fun is what&#039;s most important to us.

Porter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks for trying Insight out.</p>
<p>We noticed a bug with Insight when  deployed here that we&#8217;ve not seen at other sites.  It is now fixed, so the inline questions and comments should now be available for everyone.</p>
<p>Thanks!  Please do keep the feedback coming.  Making Insight clear, useful, and fun is what&#8217;s most important to us.</p>
<p>Porter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gordon</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66729</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66729</guid>
		<description>Is it a bug or an intended feature that readers can&#039;t see comments made through Insight by other readers? On sites where the comments are good, I find myself paying almost as much attention to them as to the content itself.

I think it&#039;s an interesting idea but the implementation isn&#039;t very user-friendly or particularly useful/interesting to readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a bug or an intended feature that readers can&#8217;t see comments made through Insight by other readers? On sites where the comments are good, I find myself paying almost as much attention to them as to the content itself.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s an interesting idea but the implementation isn&#8217;t very user-friendly or particularly useful/interesting to readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66687</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66687</guid>
		<description>Ads?
What ads?

I prefer Disqus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ads?<br />
What ads?</p>
<p>I prefer Disqus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Pacheco</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pacheco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66425</guid>
		<description>I like this idea in theory due to its contextual nature. But after using it once to comment on one of your other posts, I&#039;m really confused. I can&#039;t tell if my comment went anywhere, and if it did where it&#039;s going to eventually show up.

And how do I tell you this? Through a traditional comment of course!

Cool idea if it works. I guess I&#039;ll see when the comment is posted (unless it got lost in the ether).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this idea in theory due to its contextual nature. But after using it once to comment on one of your other posts, I&#8217;m really confused. I can&#8217;t tell if my comment went anywhere, and if it did where it&#8217;s going to eventually show up.</p>
<p>And how do I tell you this? Through a traditional comment of course!</p>
<p>Cool idea if it works. I guess I&#8217;ll see when the comment is posted (unless it got lost in the ether).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ryan</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66253</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66253</guid>
		<description>This adds more clutter to the site. And anything that forces me to read more instructions isn&#039;t good...

The problem with user comments isn&#039;t the interface (and there&#039;s nothing wrong with a &#039;standard&#039; interface). The problem is the anonymous, unmoderated structure of most comments implementations. The predictable result is crackpots saying all sorts of wildly inaccurate, off-topic, racist/ugly stuff. I think it turns off huge numbers of people. In fact, one of the reasons I&#039;ve kept my print newspaper subscription is that there aren&#039;t these comments -- and I can count on a variety of reasonably intelligent views on the letters-to-the-editor page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This adds more clutter to the site. And anything that forces me to read more instructions isn&#8217;t good&#8230;</p>
<p>The problem with user comments isn&#8217;t the interface (and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with a &#8217;standard&#8217; interface). The problem is the anonymous, unmoderated structure of most comments implementations. The predictable result is crackpots saying all sorts of wildly inaccurate, off-topic, racist/ugly stuff. I think it turns off huge numbers of people. In fact, one of the reasons I&#8217;ve kept my print newspaper subscription is that there aren&#8217;t these comments &#8212; and I can count on a variety of reasonably intelligent views on the letters-to-the-editor page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @AdNys</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66221</link>
		<dc:creator>@AdNys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66221</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t appear to work in iPod touch - does it work on any mobile interface?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t appear to work in iPod touch &#8211; does it work on any mobile interface?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Outing</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/02/20/a-new-way-to-comment-like-it-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-66142</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Outing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveouting.com/?p=1240#comment-66142</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s always an adventure installing alpha and beta software on your Wordpress blog. I&#039;m having trouble getting this to work properly (can&#039;t see others&#039; comments and ratings). I&#039;ll check in with the developer for help.

It is an intriguing concept, though. I&#039;d love a user-comments feature that allows discussion of specific parts of a blog post or article (sentences, photos, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s always an adventure installing alpha and beta software on your Wordpress blog. I&#8217;m having trouble getting this to work properly (can&#8217;t see others&#8217; comments and ratings). I&#8217;ll check in with the developer for help.</p>
<p>It is an intriguing concept, though. I&#8217;d love a user-comments feature that allows discussion of specific parts of a blog post or article (sentences, photos, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

